Proper behavior and attire for the 19th Century American Man
|
I am pleased to present the Gentleman's Page: a resource for those who wish to look and act like; or perhaps better understand, the 19th Century American man. It is intended to help costumers, theatrical performers, museum docents, reenactors and anyone with an interest in the life of 19th Century America. |
|
I have focused on the period from the Civil War (1860) to the turn of the Century, as it represents a period of considerable stability in mens' fashions and is the period in which there is the greatest interest out here in the West. This site contains original photographs from my collection, photographs of surviving clothing, explanations of what to wear when, and excerpts from 19th Century books of etiquette. The Website is arranged as follows: The "Behavior" section addresses issues such as how to act in public, how to deal with others, and generally, how to comport yourself as a gentleman. Then, to leven that somewhat, I have included some unflattering descriptions of American male behavior. The "Attire" section focuses on the details of historically correct men's wear. It is illustrated with photographs from the author's collection and photos of the details of some original garments. The "Historical Photo Collection" contains 19th and early 20th Century images from my collection. |
|
"A well dressed man does not require so much an extensive as a varied wardrobe. He wants a different costume for every season and every occasion; but if what he selects is simple rather than striking, he may appear in the same clothes as often as he likes, as long as they are fresh and appropriate to the season and the object.
There are four kinds of coats which he must have: a business coat, a frock coat, a dress-coat and an overcoat. A well dressed man may do well with four of the first, and one each of the others per annum. An economical man may get by with less."
"The dress of a gentleman should be such as not to excite any special observation, unless it be for neatness and propriety. The utmost care should be exercised to avoid even the appearance of desiring to attract attention by the peculiar formation of any article of attire, or by the display of an immoderate quantity of jewelry, both being a positive evidence of vulgarity. His dress should be studiously neat, leaving no other impression than that of a well dressed gentleman."
Martine's Handbook of Etiquette, 1866
"Don't dress like a 'dude' or a 'swell'; nor carry a little poodle dog (a man's glory is his strength and manliness--not in aping silly girls), nor cock your hat on one side, nor tip it back on your head (let it sit straight and square), nor wear anything conspicuous or that will make you offensive to others"
Modern Manners and Social Forms, 1889
"The native independence of American character regards with disdain many of the stringent social laws which are recognized in England and on the continent. Thus, the dress which many of our countrymen adopt...would subject them to serious annoyance abroad."
"Martine's Handbook" 1866

"It was at one time the fashion to affect a certain negligence, which was called poetic, and supposed to be the result of genius. An ill-tied, if not positively untied cravat was a sure sign of an unbridled imagination; and a waistcoat was held together by one button only, as if the swelling soul in the wearer's bosom had burst all the rest. If in addition to this the hair was unbrushed and curly, you were certain of passing for a "man of soul". I should not recommend any young gentleman to adopt this style, unless he can mouth a great deal, and has a good stock of quotations of the poets. It is of no use to show me the clouds, unless I can see you in them, and no amount of negligence in your dress and person will convince me you are a genius, unless you can produce an octavo volume of poems published by yourself"
The Habits of Good Society, 1859
This last quote is an attack on the fashion of the late 1850s and 1860s for men to look like they slept in their rumpled clothes, with sloppy unsymmetrical ties, greasy stringy hair, and some number of vest buttons invariably undone. This general sloppiness can be seen in thousands of Civil War era images.
The sack suit, or business suit, (or, in Britain, the "lounge suit") was leisure wear for men who might wear a frock coat, and the best clothes of vast majority of American men. A banker would wear a sack suit to a picnic, and a cowboy or farmer would wear it to church.
It first came into fashion in the 1850s as a very large, baggy garment, and then became more fitted in the '60s and beyond. It evolved into the modern three piece suit.
Its popularity was assured by the fact that it could be purchased, ready made, at prices working men could afford
To the left is a summer sack suit, of white linen or lightweight wool, with a straw hat. Linen sack suits tended to be baggier than wool ones. Click on the image to see a larger view.
Note that one often sees straw hats worn with dark, winter weight wool suits as well, as the 19th Century gentleman's only concession to summer heat.
The most common colors were black or gray, and the pieces usually, but not always, matched. They could be almost any color though, and plaid was particularly popular.
The coat usually had four buttons, the top one of which was generally buttoned--the rest left undone.
The gentleman on the right is breaking the rule of matching trousers and upper garments, and is in fact wearing the striped gray tousers which one is supposed to wear with a morning or frock suit. Since he is also wearing a white tie, he may be a member of a wedding party, and this is his way of "dressing up" his ordinary sack suit, or maybe he is a just an American and doesn't worry too much about "the rules".![]()
Note the splendid tall crowned bowler hat (typical of the late '70s and 1880s), the watch chain attached to one of the top vest buttons, the vest cut straight across the waist, and the bone, wood or gutta-percha (gavinized rubber) buttons. On frock or morning coats, the buttons were usually covered in silk or other fabric, while they were usually uncovered on sack suits.
Click on the image for a larger view.
The frock coat was single or double breasted, usually black, bottom hem above the knee, and distinguished by a squared shape at the bottom front. Its companion, the morning coat was single breasted and has a rounded, swallow tail shape. Both were referred to as "morning" dress, to distinguish them from evening dress. Both were worn with top hats. In the South and West however, top hats were often replaced by broad brimmed, low crowned hats for everyday frock suit wear. Garish colorful vests, often of patterned Chinese silk, were still common with frock suits through the early '60s, but were replaced by black, white or gray by the '70s. The same applied to ties. Colorful cravats were often seen with Frocks in the '60s, but by the '70s most, but not all, had been replaced by small black bow ties.
In the 1850s and 60s, it was common for those wearing black frock coats to wear black trousers. from the '60s on, it became more fashionable to wear charcoal gray trousers, often pin striped.
"The morning dress for gentlemen is a black frock coat, or a black cut-away, white or black vest, according to the season, gray or colored pants, plaid or stripes according to the fashion, a high silk stove pipe hat, and a black scarf or necktie. A black frock coat with black pants is not considered a good combination.. The morning dress is suitable for garden parties, Sundays, social teas, informal calls, morning calls and receptions."
"Our Deportment" 1879
"At afternoon funerals, wear a frock coat and top hat. Should the funeral be your own, the hat may be dispensed with."
The Cynic's Rules of Conduct. 1905
Key elements of a Frock Suit (Click on the image for a larger view):
* Small black bow tie. Colorful ties are seldom seen with frock suits after the 1860s.
* Black wool vest (it might well have been colorful silk in the 1860s) This one is double breasted, but it could just as easily have been single breasted.
* Watch chain. This one is made of braided hair.
* Shirt cuffs visible at the wrist.
* Winged shirt collar on a white shirt. Something similar can be purchased at any modern tux shop. Note that a colorful shirt is never worn with a frock suit. It is always white.
This page contains pictures of a late 19th or early 20th Century frock coat in my collection.
It is double breasted and made of black, very fine, heavy weight wool (lighter than overcoat wool, but heavier than modern "suit weight" wool). It is trimmed in wool grosgrain, with silk lining.
The buttons are covered with black silk. Covered buttons are an almost invariable rule with late 19th Century black frock coats. I have yet to see one with a contrasting button, or a button of some visible material like metal or bone.
The lapels are cut wide, and notched, and there is a slant handkerchief pocket on the left breast. Note that other than a wallet pocket on the inside left breast, there are no other pockets on this coat. Pockets at the waist, which are common on modern reproductions, are not present on this example, nor have I ever seen them on any other original frock coat.
There are non functional button holes on each lapel (ideal for inserting a flower).
While this coat is double breasted, single breasted frock coats were also quite common.
The coat is lined with silk, with a certain amount of padding at the chest (makes one look more manly). The sleeve is lined in white cotton. There is a horizontal wallet pocket inside the left breast, visible at the middle right of this picture. It does not have slash pockets in the tails, though many such coats do.
You may click on any of the images to see a larger view.
![]()
In the early 1880s, a compromise was made between the, by then, rigid formality of the Frock Suit and the laid back informality of the Sack Suit. The result was the Morning Suit.
This suit retained the gray, striped trousers and black vest and coat of the Frock Suit, but softened the lines a bit by rounding the bottom hem of the coat and shrinking the lapels.
Further, unlike the frock suit for which a top hat was essential (at least in town), the Morning Suit allowed a certain amount of latitude in headgear, with top hats for business and formal calls, and a tall crowned bowler for less dressy occasions. There was also more latitude with neck wear than with a Frock Suit, with Windsor ties more common than bow ties.
The Morning Suit could be worn at weddings, funerals, calls of ceremony, teas and other daytime formal occasions. It could also be worn for business, but the Frock Coat still reigned supreme with the management in the office. The Sack Suit or Morning Suit was suitable for more junior staff and clerks.
This page contains photographs of an 1890s Morning Coat, which should give a fair idea of typical construction techniques. There was considerable uniformity in Victorian tailoring, so most of what one sees on this garment could apply to many others.
The coat is made of charcoal gray (almost black) wool with a rough texture. The edges are finished with silk grosgrain. The grosgrain used to be black, but has faded to gray. The buttons are covered with silk.


Gentleman's evening wear changed hardly at all from around 1860 until the 1920s. It was a unvarying uniform of black tail coat, white bow tie, black or white vest (there seems to have been some personal latitude in selecting a vest--black being the most common) and black trousers, with a white, heavily starched shirt. The only thing that changed was the collar, which became tall and stiff around 1890.
Outdoors, evening wear would be worn with a silk top hat and a black cape or overcoat.
White gloves were an essential accessory, especially when dancing, as touching a lady with bare hands was not only a bit crude, but one's sweat could soil her gown.
"A gentleman retains his 'walking' or 'morning' attire until six or seven o'clock when he dresses for the evening"
"Everybody's Book" 1893
"The evening or full dress suit for gentlemen is a black dress-suit--a 'swallow tail' coat, the vest cut low, the cravat white, and kid gloves of the palest hue or white. The shirt front should be white and plain; the studs and cuff buttons simple. Especial attention should be given to the hair, which should be neither short nor long. It is better to err on the too short side, as too long hair savors of affectation, destroys the shape of the physiognomy, and has a touch of vulgarity about it. Evening dress is the same for a large dinner party, a ball or an opera. In some circles, however, evening dress is considered to be an affectation, and it is well to do as others do. On Sunday, morning dress is worn, and on that day of the week no gentleman is expected to appear in evening dress, either at church, at home or away from home. Gloves are dispensed with at dinner parties, and pale colors [of gloves] are preferred to white for evening wear."
"Our Deportment" 1882![]()
(Note: you can click on either of these photographs for a larger view)
"The attire in which a gentleman can present himself in a ball room admits of so little variety, that it can be described in a few words.
He must wear a black dress coat, black trousers and a black vest, and a black or white necktie and kid gloves, and patent leather pumps.
This is imperative, the ball suit should be of the very best cloth and of the latest style as to cut. The vest should be cut low, so as to disclose an ample shirt front. Small gold or diamond studs may be used with effect. Much display of jewelry is a proof of bad taste. A handsome watch chain with perhaps the addition of a few costly trifles suspended to it, and a set of shirt studs, are the only adornments of this kind that a gentleman should wear. Perfume should only be used for the handkerchief, and should be of the very best and most delicate character."
"Prof. M. J. Koncen's quadrille call book and ball-room guide" 1883
"When a gentleman is invited out for the evening, he is under no embarrassment as to what he shall wear. He has not to sit down and consider whether he shall wear blue or pink, or whether the Joneses will notice if he wear the same attire three times running. Fashion has ordained for him that he shall always be attired in a black dress suit in the evening, only allowing him a white waistcoat as an occasional relief to his toilette. His necktie must be white or light colored. An excess of jewelry is to be avoided but he may wear gold or diamond studs, and a watch chain. He may also wear a flower in his buttonhole, for this is one of the few allowable devices by which he may brighten his attire.
Plain and simple as the dress is, it is a sure test of a gentlemanly appearance. The man who dines in evening dress every night of his life looks easy and natural in it, whereas the man who takes to it late in life generally succeeds in looking like a waiter."
The Ball Room Guide. 1860
The vast majority of American men did not even wear sack suits for every day attire.
Farmers, laborers, ranchers, factory workers and such usually wore a outfit of sturdy wool, corduroy or denim trousers, a wool flannel, linen or cotton pull over shirt, a hat and sturdy shoes. Suspenders were commonly worn, though they were unpopular with men who had to bend or squat a lot, like sailors, cowboys or miners. Trousers did not have belt loops until the 20th Century.
The fellow on the left is a farmer around 1890-though he could just as easily have been from 1860. His collar button is buttoned. Unbuttoned collars are rarely seen. Click on the image for a larger view
The daily wear of working men also frequently made use of second hand or worn out pieces of sack, frock or morning suits. Vests were also frequently worn.
The man on the left in the picture on the right is wearing a cotton duck or denim bib apron, a common garment with blacksmiths or others doing particularly dirty work.
The substantial fellow next to him is typical of a western farmer or rancher, in his colorful shirt (red, blue or checked were the most common), smashed hat and (it would appear), neckerchief. His trousers may have been black dress pants in a former life.

The man on the left is wearing the ever popular black string bow tie, made from a black silk ribbon, about an inch high and a yard long. This image is probably from the 1870s.
The fellow on the right has no tie, but his collar is closed with a stud. Men without ties are very common in 19th Century American photos -- sometimes with heavily starched shirts, nice suits and all the paraphernalia of proper attire. This is an interesting phenomenon that attests to a general lack of a standard of what constituted "proper attire" in 19th Century America. This image probably dates from the 1880s. Also of note is his rather limp and ungroomed mustache, which contrasts sharply with the wonderfully sculpted facial hair on the next gent in this series.
The fellow on the left, with his splendid mustache may be my favorite image from this collection. He is wearing a Windsor tie with a nice big symmetrical knot and a tie pin stuck through at the proper place. Of particular interest (if you can stop looking at his mustache for a moment) is his collar, which is very low and banded. It looks like it is, in fact, the neck band of the shirt, which could take a detachable collar, but no such collar is attached. This image most probably dates from the 1880s, judging from his generally well-groomed look.

There is an interesting progression in men's styles. In the 1860s, almost every man in America looks like they slept in their clothes, and even major government officials appear in rumpled and stained clothing with unkempt stringy hair - and vests invariably have two or three buttons unbuttoned. About 1870, there is a change and men's styles become more and more about looking tidy and well groomed. Hair becomes shorter and nicely combed and oiled, facial hair becomes less effusive and more trimmed, vests get fully buttoned and clothing becomes better fitted and crisper. This continues until the turn of the Century, when collars become tall and stiff and clothing becomes so well fitted as to be quite constraining.
On the right side, this fine looking young man from the 1890s is wearing a Windsor tie, in patterned silk, tucked into one side after a fashion that seems to have been popular in the US in the late 19th Century (I have seen several examples of it). No tie pin is visible.
His collar is the winged style often called "Patricide", based on a fictitious story that a young man returned from university wearing the new style starched collar (new in the 1850s). When his father embraced him, the points on the collar cut his father's throat.
This, of course, never happened but the story was enough to name the collar. This style was frequently worn with frock suits, morning suits and evening wear (he seems to be wearing a morning suit). It was less often worn with sack suits.
Stiff collars were usually removable, so they could be washed and starched apart from the shirt, and thrown away when they became worn, while the shirt could remain in service for many years.
Removable collars were usually made of linen. Disposable paper and then celluloid collars came on the market at the end of the 19th Century.
This is a men's dress shirt with a small standing collar. It is typical of men's shirts of the second half of the 19th Century. It is difficult to date this shirt exactly, but it probably comes from the late 19th or early 20th Century and is probably French.
It is a pull over, with three small bone buttons on a placket front. It is long, and comes down to the wearer's knees.
The cuffs close with cuff links.
It is cut full, though not so full as shirts of the 18th Century. It is made of white cotton.
The shirt is gathered into the yolk in delicate pin tucks. The red smudge at the bottom of the placket is an embroidered laundry mark of the owner's initials.
I would note that commercially available reproduction shirts differ from this original in a few important ways. First, I have yet to see a repro that is anything like long enough (men's shirts were often their only underwear), repros nearly always have buttons that are way too big, and repros are often cut too full, and lack the well-fitted subtlety of the originals.
The vest was an essential part of a gentleman's wardrobe in the 19th Century. It was only ever dispensed with by men doing hard manual labor--though they often sported one as well.
In the 1840s to the 1860s, colorful vests, often of patterned Chinese silk were popular, especially in the South and the West. They are now associated with gamblers, but they had a wider appeal in their time. Gamblers were the last to give them up.
From the 1870s on, vests tended to be black or white for wear with frock coats, morning coats or evening dress coats, which of course, were also black by that time. When worn with a sack suit, they would be of a color to match the suit. Evening vests were cut low to show off the shirt. In the 1860s, the day vest was also often fairly low cut with a broad shawl collar. From the 1870s, the day vest would tend to be fairly high cut and have a small, notched lapel.
There are a few points of difference between 20th Century vests and 19th Century vests. 19th Century vests usually (though not always) had lapels, either in a shawl or notched style. They also nearly always had a lower hem that was parallel to the ground, rather than the modern vest which tapers downward in front.
These are some photographs of a late 19th Century day vest in my collection. Click on the images for a larger view.

"The old saying that it takes two generations to make a gentleman is being refuted every day, for Americans are remarked not only for their facility in amassing fortunes but in furnishing themselves with presentable manners on short notice"
Correct Social Usage, 1903
"It is the duty of a gentleman to know how to ride, to shoot, to fence, to box, to swim, to row and to dance. He should be graceful. If attacked by ruffians, a man should be able to defend himself, and also to defend women from their insults"
Rules of Etiquette and Home Culture. 1886
"Keep up appearances whatever you do"
Charles Dickens in Martin Chuzzlewit, 1843
The following web pages will endeavor to give a rough notion of what was expected of 19th Century American Gentlemen, as presented in etiquette books, with a leavening of how they really behaved, as presented in the works of foreign observers and social commentators.
The 19th Century was a time of tremendous social and economic flux. The Industrial Revolution created a consumer economy and a huge middle class with the means of purchasing consumer goods. This new middle class felt that they had arrived at a higher social plane of existence. The social norms of the farm and the tenement would not do for the family of a man who had made his way in the world.
The new middle class wanted to purchase appropriate manners, just as they could purchase fashionable homes, stylish clothing or the latest domestic gadget. From the 1850s on, the market was flooded with etiquette books which laid out to people who had never been exposed to such things, the rules of "polite society". In many cases, they also did not describe 19th Century America as it was, but as the author hoped it could become.
Ironically, these rules were based upon the norms of the 18th Century European aristocratic society which the middle class had supplanted and rendered obsolete -- and tended to disdain for its decadence and effeminacy.
These changes were taking place throughout the European and American world, but in America, an additional dynamic was present. 19th Century Americans were keenly aware of the uniqueness of their democratic institutions and society, and many saw the manners of "polite society" as contrary to the egalitarian nature of America. Hifaluten manners were a thing of the decadent Old World. This often manifested itself in loud, coarse and rough behavior and downright rudeness--especially on the part of the have-nots towards the haves. Anyone who wore a top hat had to be ready to patiently endure the "I'm as good a man as you" reception he might get from every white porter, cab driver, sailor and ditch digger he might encounter.
There was a gradual shift here however. As the century wore on, the norms of the middle class diffused throughout society, and "coarse behavior" became far less the norm in 1900 than it was in 1800. By the 20th Century, a watered down version of middle class manners had become the property of the entire society, which led in the years following the First World War, to a general informalization of manners, with Victorian notions of social ritual being tossed out in favor of a more "modern" and less clearly delineated approach to behavior.
The manners of the 19th Century, as expressed in etiquette books, do contain many elaborate social rituals which seem a bit quaint to us moderns, but the vast majority of their space is devoted to what would seem to be common sense rules like "Don't chew with your mouth open" or "Don't interrupt people" or "Don't be a lot of bother when you are a house guest". Two things may be drawn from this. First, there must have been a lot of people back then (just as there are today) who lacked "common courtesy" and needed to be told such things, and second, if you wish to portray a refined 19th Century American, just do the things your mama taught you, and you are more than half way there already. Perhaps the rest of this website will help you get you over the other half.
"The true gentleman is one who has been fashioned after the highest models...his qualities depend not on fashion or manners but upon moral worth--not on personal possessions but upon personal qualities"
Happy Homes and the Hearts that Make Them, 1882
"Awkwardness of attitude betrays a want of good home training and physical culture. A man should not lounge in a chair, nurse his leg, caress his foot crossed over his knee or bite his nails. A gentleman is allowed more freedom than a lady. He may sit cross-legged if he wish, but should not sit with his knees far apart, nor with his foot on his knee. In indicating an object, move the whole hand, or the head, but never point the finger. All should be quiet and graceful, either in their sitting or standing position."
Rules of Etiquette and Home Culture, 1886
"A good manner is the best letter of recommendation among strangers. Civility, refinement and gentleness are passports to hearts and homes, while awkwardness, coarseness and gruffness are met with locked doors and closed hearts".
Our Deportment. 1881
"Never scratch your head, pick your teeth, clean your nails, or worse of all, pick your nose in company; all these things are disgusting. Spit as little as possible and never upon the floor.
If you are going into the presence of ladies, beware of onions, spirits and tobacco."
The Art of Good Behavior. 1845
"It is a great thing to be able to walk like a gentleman--that is, to get rid of that awkward, lounging, swinging gate of a clown and stop before you reach the affected and flippant step of the dandy. In short, nothing but being a gentleman can give you the air and step of one"
Martine's Handbook. 1866
"A gentleman never sits in the house with his hat on in the presence of ladies for a single moment. Indeed, so strong is the force of habit that a gentleman will quite unconsciously remove his hat on entering a parlor, or drawing room, even if there is no one present but himself. People who sit in the house with their hats on are to be suspected of having spent most of their time in bar rooms and similar places"
Martine's Handbook 1866
"...one must advance or thrust forward the chest or sternum, by drawing back the tops of the shoulders, taking care to keep them down; and at the same time holding the arms a little forward, so that the hands may be in a line with the foreside of the thighs. The head is to be held back in a becoming manner, but without stiffness; and the chin kept down, but not so as to give the figure an air of constraint"
"To a casual acquaintance you may bow without speaking; but to those with whom you are well acquainted greater cordiality is due. A bow should always be returned; even to an enemy it is courtesy to return his recognition."
"Hill's Manual of Forms" 1873
"Between gentlemen, an inclination of the head, a gesture of the hand, or a mere touching of the hat is sufficient; but in bowing to a lady, the hat must be lifted from the head."
"The body is not bent at all in bowing; the inclination of the head is all that is necessary"
Our Deportment 1881
"In meeting a lady it is optional with her whether she shall pause to speak. If the gentleman has anything to say to her, he should not stop her, but turn around and walk in her company until he has said what he has to say, when he may leave her with a bow and a lift of the hat."
Our Deportment, 1881
"One should always recognize lady acquaintances in the street, either by bowing or words of greeting, a gentleman lifting his hat. If they stop to speak, it is not obligatory to shake hands. Shaking hands [between a lady and gentleman] is not forbidden, but in most cases it is to be avoided in public."
Our Deportment, 1881
"If...you have been introduced to a person whose acquaintance you do not desire, you may merely make the formal bow of etiquette when you meet him, which, of itself, encourages no familiarity; but the bow is indispensible, for he cannot be thought a gentleman who would pass another with a vacant stare, after having been formally presented to him...
What is called 'cutting' another is never practiced by gentlemen or ladies, except in some extraordinary instances of bad conduct on the part of the individual thus sacrificed"
Martine's Handbook, 1866
"Calling" was a somewhat ritualized version of the fine old American custom of "visiting". It was not nearly so important for the gentleman as it was for the lady. It generally fell upon the middle class lady to do what had to be done to hold "Society" together. Even if the gentleman was doing the calling, it was generally the lady who was receiving callers. Ladies did not call on gentlemen except on matters of business. Gentleman called on one another with little ceremony.

"If you are thrown amongst fashionable people, you must not pay a visit to a lady before two o'clock PM, nor after four, as if you call before that time, you will interrupt those avocations which more or less occupy every lady in the early part of the day: if later than four o'clock, you will prevent her driving out"
Hints on Etiquette, 1836
"[Calls]..are those of ceremony, friendship and condolence, and occupy no small portion of time.
Such visits are necessary, in order to maintain good feelings between members of society...
...Professional men, are not however, expected to pay such visits, because their time is preoccupied; but they form almost the only exception"
Martine's Handbook, 1866
"If your friend or acquaintance is [away] from home, leave a card...the servant will answer your inquiry and receive your card; but on no account ask leave to go in and rest; neither urge your wish if you fancy the lady whom you desire to see is really at home or even if you flatter yourself that she would make an exception in your favor. Some people think that the form of words 'not at home' is readily understood to mean that the master or mistress of the house have no wish to see even his or her most intimate acquaintances."
Martine's Handbook, 1866
"A gentleman when making a formal call should retain his hat and gloves in his hands on entering the room. The hat should not be laid upon the table or stand, unless it is found necessary from some cause to set it down. In that case, place it upon the floor. An umbrella should be left in the hall. In an informal call, the hat, gloves, overcoat and cane may be left in the hall."
Our Deportment, 1881
"When one moves into a new neighborhood, it is the place of the neighbors to extend the hand of welcome to the strangers. The ladies should call on Mrs. A, the newcomer, just as soon as they think she is settled. And the gentleman should make it a point to get acquainted Mr. A, if not by a call, by speaking to him in the drug store or where ever they may meet...
Where a woman makes calls in the afternoon, it is always cheery for the hostess to offer a cup of tea with crackers or cake...It does not seem necessary to have visiting cards. In a small place everyone knows who everyone is, and while it is all right to have them, still they are oftener not used than used. The name of the caller is left by saying "Tell Mr. A that Mr. B called; nothing important".
NOTE: I included this as it is a rare glimpse (rare at least for etiquette books) at what the vast majority of Americans were doing. It was placed in the book to contrast country manners with city manners. These, of course, are country manners.
Correct Social Usage, 1903
"Besides leaving a card, leave all the small articles of value that you may find lying about in the dressing room"
The Cynic's Rules of Conduct, 1905
![]() |
"To the unrefined and underbred, the visiting card is but a trifling bit of paper; but to the cultured disciple of social law, it conveys a subtle and unmistakable intelligence. Its texture, style of engraving, and even the hour of its leaving combine to place the stranger, whose name it bears, in a pleasant or a disagreeable attitude..." Our Deportment, 1881 |
Visiting cards, or calling cards, were an essential accessory to any 19th Century middle class lady or gentleman. They served as tangible evidence of meeting social obligations, as well as a streamlined letter of introduction. They also served as an aid to memories which were no stronger then than they are today. The stack of cards in the card tray in the hall was a handy catalog of exactly who had called and whose calls might need to be returned. They did smack of affectation however, and were not generally used among country folk or working class Americans. Business cards on the other hand, were widespread among men and women of all classes with a business to promote. There was a rigid distinction between business and visiting cards, and it was considered to be in very poor taste to use a business card when making a social call. A business card, left with the servants, could imply that you had called to collect a bill.
![]() The basic gentleman's card. It could even be hand written if his penmanship was good.
A military man's card. The "USA" stands for United States Army. An officer could also list his unit (e.g. "8th US Infantry") or ship. Army lieutenants and Naval officers under the rank of lieutenant would not put their rank in front of their names, but put it in small type in the lower left corner (e.g. "Lieutenant, USA", or "Master, USN").
A business card. It is made so by the name of his firm under his name.
A physician's card. This is, in fact, the card of a female doctor, but is identical in form to that of a man. Doctors, lawyers, clergymen and military officers needed only one card for both business and social obligations, and included their titles on the card. The address is optional on all forms of card. |
"Callers should always be provided with cards. A gentleman should carry them loose in a convenient pocket; but a lady may use a card case. No matter how many members of the family you call upon, you send in but one card. Where servants are not kept, and you are met at the door by the lady herself, of course there is no use for a card. If you call upon a friend who has a visitor, send in but one card; but if they are not at home, leave a card for each" "Calls of pure ceremony are sometimes made by simply handing in a card" "When a stranger arrives in the city, he should send his card, with directions, to those whom he expects to call upon him. Otherwise his presence might remain for some time unknown. If a stranger of your own profession comes to the city, you should call upon him even though you do not know him." "A card may be made to serve the purpose of a call. It may be sent in an envelope, or left in person. In the latter case, one corner should be turned down if for the lady of the house. Fold the card in the middle if you wish to indicate that the call is on several, or all of the members of the family. Leave a card for each guest, should any be visiting at the house" "A card enclosed in an envelope for the purpose of returning a call made in person, expresses a desire that visiting between the parties be ended. When such is not the intention, cards should not be enclosed in an envelope."
A trade card. Cards like this would be handed to potential customers, left lying about in conspicuous places, and distributed to private residences in the same manner as calling cards. "A man never carries or leaves the cards of any other man, nor can he assume any of the responsibilities or etiquette relating to the cards of any of his feminine relatives or friends. Men never presumed to crease or bend their cards,when such habits were in fashion, and they do not do so today." Correct Social Usage, 1903 |
A married lady with teen-age daughters. Tuesday is the day upon which she is "at home" to callers. Note that her husband is named "Ingram", not she. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ladies and gentlemen were on their best behavior in the ballroom. Manners were more formal, clothing was finer, and bows were deeper.
Men were expected to be extremely active in the ballroom to make up for the total passivity required of ladies; who could not ask gentlemen to dance, and who could not even be seen to cross the dance floor unescorted. Ladies would be conveyed to their station by a gentleman, and there they would wait until another gentleman came to speak to them, ask them to dance or convey them to the punchbowl.
"The gentleman should call for the lady whom he is to escort, go with her to the ball, escort her to the dressing room, return to join her there when she is ready to go to the reception room... engage her company for the first dance, and escort her to supper when she is ready to go. He must watch and see that she has a partner for dancing through the entire evening. Upon reaching home, if the lady invites him in, he must decline. It is his duty to call in two days".
"A gentleman should always walk around a lady's train and never attempt to step over it. If by accident he should tread upon her dress, he should beg her pardon, and if by greater awkwardness he should tear it, he must offer to escort her to the dressing room so that it may be repaired. If in the ball room a lady asks any favor of a gentleman, such as to inquire if her carriage is waiting, he should under no circumstances refuse her requests... well bred gentleman will look after those who are unsought and neglected in the dance".
Rules for the Ballroom
A man who knows how to dance, and refuses to do so, should absent himself from a ball.
Noisy talking and boisterous laughter in a ballroom are contrary to the rules of etiquette.
In a ballroom, never forget nor confuse your engagements. If such should occur, an apology, of course, must be offered and pleasantly accepted.
Always wear white gloves in a ballroom. Very light shades are admissible.
Usually a married couple do not dance together in society, but it is a sign of unusual attention for a husband to dance with his wife, and he may do so if he wishes.
Great care should be taken by a lady in refusing to dance with a gentleman. After refusing, she should not accept another invitation for the same dance.
"When gentleman are introduced to ladies at a ball for the purpose of dancing, upon meeting afterward, they should wait to be recognized before speaking; but they are at liberty to recall themselves by lifting their hats in passing. An introduction for dancing does not constitute a speaking acquaintance"
[Editor's note: ladies and gentlemen could not dance unless they had been introduced, so the hosts and escort spent much of the evening rushing about making introductions]
All the above quotes are from "Rules of Etiquette & Home Culture" 1886
What's Wrong With This Picture?
* He has no jacket at the table.
* He's reading a newspaper.
* He must be a bad father.
The picture is captioned "The home where table etiquette is ignored rears the ill-bred child" from "Correct Social Usage" 1903
No where was a man's breeding or lack thereof more on display than at the table. While some rules seem a bit quaint, most 19th Century table manners would not be out of place today. People still don't like it when you slurp your soup, or spray food when you talk.
"Nothing indicates a well bred man more than a proper mode of eating. A man may pass muster by dressing well, and may sustain himself tolerably in conversation; but if he be not perfectly "au fait", dinner will betray him."
Hints on etiquette 1836
Manners aside, all was not well at the American table. Numerous commentators noted the absence of the husband from the domestic table, American's refusal to carry on friendly conversation while eating, and a tendency to eat rapidly and get the job of eating over as soon as possible. It was little wonder that dyspepsia (indigestion) was considered an epidemic among American men.
A Few Rules
* Do not play with the table utensils or crumble the bread.
* Do not put your elbows on the table, or sit too far back, or lounge
* Do not talk loud or boisterously
* Be cheerful in conduct or conversation
* Never, if possible, cough or sneeze at the table.
* Never tilt back your chair while at the table, or at any other time.
* Do not talk when the mouth is full
* Never make a noise while eating
* Do not open the mouth while chewing, but keep the lips closed. It is not necessary to show people how you masticate your food.
* Never indicate that you notice anything unpleasant in the food.
* Do not break your bread into the soup, nor mix with gravy. It is bad taste to mix food on the plate.
* Never leave the table before the rest of the family or guests, without asking the host or hostess to excuse you.
* Eat soup with the side of the spoon, without noise.
* The fork is used to convey the food to the mouth, except when a spoon is necessary for liquids.
* Raw oysters are eaten with a fork.
* If you wish to be served with more tea or coffee, place your spoon in your saucer.
* Tea or coffee should never be poured into the saucer to cool, but sipped from the cup.
* If a dish is presented to you, serve yourself first and then pass it on.
Rules of Etiquette and Home Culture, 1886
* Never allow butter, soup or other food to remain on your whiskers
* Never wear gloves at the table, unless your hands are for some special reason unfit to be seen.
* Never, when serving others, overload the plate nor force upon them delicacies which they decline.
* Never make a great display when removing hair, insects or other disagreeable things from your food. Place them quietly under the edge of your plate.
Hill's Forms
* Eat Cheese with a fork, not a knife
* Ask a servant in a low tone for what you want
* Break your bread, do not cut it.
* Eat fruit with silver knives and forks
* If you prefer, take up asparagus with the fingers. Olives and artichokes are always so eaten
* If a course is set before you that you do not wish, do not touch it.
* It is not your business to reprove the waiter for improper conduct; that belongs to your host.
* A gentleman must help a lady whom he has escorted to the table, to all she wishes; but it is improper for him to offer to help other ladies who have escorts
* Use a napkin only for your mouth. Never use it for your nose, face or forehead.
* It is very rude to pick your teeth at the table. If it becomes necessary to do so, hold your napkin over your mouth.
Rules of Etiquette and Home Culture, 1886
"At a sign from the hostess, the ladies all rise from the table, and repairing to the drawing-room, leave the gentlemen to their own devices. But it is a healthy sign that the gentlemen soon follow them. In France the gentlemen and ladies all leave the dinner table together, as indeed they do here, at an informal or family dinner."
Polite Society at Home and Abroad, 1891
"In America, with the exception of dancing, which is almost wholly confined to the unmarried of both sexes, all the enjoyments of the men are found in the absence of women. They dine, they play cards, they have musical meetings, they have suppers, all in large parties, but without women"
Fanny Trollope, Domestic Manners of the Americans.1832
"The company remained a very little while at table, and spoke scarcely a word. They really did not give themselves time to eat their food properly, but bolted it burning hot and not half-chewed, although nobody had anything to do when the meal was over. They seem to have got into the habit of regarding every thing as business, and therefore to be performed with the utmost possible dispatch"
A Lady's Journey Round the World, Ida Pfeiffer, 1855

"Chesterfield says, 'Civility is particularly due to all women; and, remember, that no provocation whatsoever can justify any man in not being civil to every woman; and the greatest man would justly be reckoned a brute if he were not civil to the meanest woman. It is due to their sex, and is the only protection they have against the superior strength of ours; nay, even a little is allowable with women; and a man may, without weakness, tell a woman she is either handsomer or wiser than she is'"
Martine's Handbook, 1866
"When entering a crowded streetcar, a lady should leave the door open. It is quite permissible for her to appropriate the seat of the man who gets up to close it"
The Cynic's Rules of Conduct, 1905
"A gentleman will assist a lady over a bad crossing, or from an omnibus or carriage, without waiting for the formality of an introduction. When the service is performed, he will raise his hat, bow and pass on."
Hill's Forms, 1873
"In passing through a door, the gentleman holds it open for the lady, even though he never saw her before. he also precedes the lady in ascending stairs, and allows her to precede him in descending."
Polite Society at Home and Abroad, 1891
"Do not press before a lady at a theater or a concert. Always yield to her, if practicable, your seat and place. Do no sit when she is standing, without offering her your place. Consult not only your own ease, but also the comfort of those around you."
Martine's Handbook, 1866
"It is not deemed polite and respectful to smoke in the presence of ladies, even though they are amiable enough to permit it."
Martine's Handbook, 1866
"If you meet a lady of your acquaintance in the street, it is her part to notice you first, unless, indeed you are very intimate. The reason is, if you bow to a lady first, she may not choose to acknowledge you, and there is no remedy; but if she bow to you--you as a gentleman cannot cut her."
Hints on Etiquette, 1836
"A gentleman removes his hat when entering a room where there are ladies. When he meets a lady friend, he should raise his hat gracefully..."
Polite Society at Home and Abroad, 1891
Should one demand the surrender of a seat to a lady in a crowded theater?
"To this, we would answer that, if the gallantry of the gentlemen thus situated does not prompt them to proffer the seats in question, it is rudeness to request it. A lady is a lady, it is true; but if she could not come early enough to get a good seat, she cannot expect that spectators who did should inconvenience themselves for her sake"
Gody's Ladies Book, Jan 1850
"...remember also that really well bred women will not thank you for making them conspicuous by over officiousness in their defense, unless, indeed, there be any serious or glaring violation of decorum. In small matters, ladies are both able and willing to take care of themselves, and would prefer being allowed to overwhelm the unlucky offender in their own way"
The American West, with its loosely organized communities of strangers, its scarcity of women and its mixing of people from all over the world, produced its own behavioral norms which, while they had their roots in Victorian America, also had their own unique character.
One of the most striking features was the Westerner's obsession with minding his own business.
Given the dubious backgrounds of many of the people who had felt compelled to leave everything behind and move out West, it became a particular point of etiquette to leave people alone and never pester them with questions about where they came from, what they were called or what they did before they left "the States".
"We ate dinner and then I joined my older brother in asking the stranger what his name was. 'Jones is the name' he said. As soon as he rode off, our mother laid us boys out for being so ill mannered as to ask any man his name".
Quoted in the Time Life Book "Cowboys"
"In the western states, I do not think that I was ever addressed first by an American sitting next to me at table. Indeed I never held any conversation at a public table in the West. I have sat in the same room with men for hours, and have not had a word spoken to me. I have done my very best to break through this ice, and have always failed. A Western American is not a talking man. He will sit for hours over a stove with his cigar in his mouth, and his hat over his eyes, chewing his cud of reflection. A dozen will sit together in the same way and there will not be a dozen words spoken between them in an hour".
Anthony Trollope, North America. 1863
"This was the first time I had ever found myself in a large party of Americans, and, as in the gambling houses of San Francisco, the first thing that struck me was the strange contrasts in their dress. The ladies were all in a grand state, and might have gone into any full-dressed parties without changing their traveling costume (the author is on a riverboat on the Sacramento); but the case was widely different with the gentlemen. Some few were well dressed, but the majority wore jackets, often torn ones, dirty boots pulled up over their trousers, and had hands so extraordinarily coarse and burned--even the best dressed gentlemen among them--that they looked as if they belonged to the commonest plowman.
The company passed the time in playing cards and chewing tobacco, without excepting even the boys of ten and twelve years old; but they did not spit about at the dreadful rate described by many travelers. They had another practice, however, if possible more abominable--namely, though they carried a pocket handkerchief, of making use of their fingers instead of it.
I actually saw this atrocity committed by quite elegantly dressed men.
If, however, these points fell grievously short, in another they maintained without any exception the character of gentlemen.
The men, one and all, showed the utmost attention and politeness to our sex. Old or young, rich or poor, well or ill-dressed, every woman was treated with respect and kindness; and in this the Americans are far in advance of my countrymen [the Austrians] and indeed, Europeans in general, who usually keep their civilities for youth, beauty, and fine clothes."
A Lady's Journey Round the World, Ida Pfeiffer, 1855
Say what was your name in the States?
Was it Johnson or Thompson or Bates?
Did you murder your wife and flee for your life?
Say what was your name in the States?
Did you have to change your name?
Was it Miller or Benton or James?
Did you spend time in jail or ride on a rail?
Say what was your name in the States?
A song of the Gold Rush, by "Anonymous"
Foreigners often had some interesting things to say about American manners that help put the words of the etiquette books into perspective. Here are a few of them, followed by a rebuttal from the redoubtable "Dame Shirley".
"...in democracies, no such thing as a regular code of good breeding can be laid down...In aristocracies, the rules of propriety impose the same demeanor on everyone; they make all the members of the same class appear alike...Amongst a democratic people, manners are neither so tutored nor so uniform, but they are frequently more sincere...Thus it may be said, in one sense, that the effect of democracy is not exactly to give men any particular manners, but to prevent them from having any manners at all"
Alexis deTocqueville. Democracy in America 1835
"Any man's son may become the equal of any other man's son, and the consciousness of that is certainly a spur to exertion; on the other hand, it is also a spur to that coarse familiarity, untempered by any shadow of respect, which is assumed by the grossest and the lowest in their intercourse with the highest and most refined."
Fanny Trollope, Domestic Manners of the Americans, 1832
"The moral sense [of the American] is on every point blunter than with us [the English]. Make an American believe that his next door neighbor is a very worthless fellow, then I dare say (if he were sure he could make nothing by him) he would drop his acquaintance; but as to what constitutes a worthless fellow; people differ on opposite sides of the Atlantic..."
Fanny Trollope, Domestic Manners of the Americans.
"We labor under great disadvantages in the judgment of foreigners. Our peculiar political institutions and the prevalence of common schools give all our people an arrogant assurance that is mistaken for the American beau ideal of a gentleman.
They are unable to distinguish those nice shades of manner which as effectually separate the clown from the gentleman with us, as do...broader lines, which mark these two classes among all other nations. They think that it is the grand characteristic of Columbia's children to be prejudiced, opinionated, selfish, avaricious and unjust. It is vain to tell them that such are not specimens of American gentlemen. They will answer "They call themselves gentlemen, and you receive them in your houses as such". It is utterly impossible for foreigners to thoroughly comprehend and make due allowance for that want of delicacy, and that vulgar "I'm as good as you are" spirit, which is, it must be confessed, peculiar to the lower classes of our people, and which would lead the majority of them to--
Enter a palace with their old felt hat on
To address the King with the title of Mister
And ask him the price of the throne he sat on."
(The absurdity of many etiquette books in trying to regulate every aspect of human behavior did not escape humorists of the time--including Samuel Clemmons).

At a Fire
Form of Tender of Rescue from Strange Young Gentleman to Strange Young Lady at a Fire.
Although through the fiat of a cruel fate, I have been debarred the gracious privilege of your acquaintance, permit me, Miss [here insert name if known], the inestimable honor of offering you the aid of a true and loyal arm against the fiery doom which now o'ershadows you with its crimson wing [this form to be memorized, and practiced in private]
Should she accept, the young gentleman would offer his arm--bowing, and observing "Permit me"--and so escort her to the fire escape and deposit her in it (being careful, if she have no clothes but her night dress, not to seem to notice the irregularity). No form of leave-taking is permissible, further than a formal bow, accompanied by a barely perceptible smile of deferential gratitude for the favor which the young lady has accorded--this smile to be completed at the moment the fire escape starts to slide down, then the features to be recomposed instantly.
A compulsory introduction at a fire is not binding upon the young lady. The young gentleman cannot require recognition at her hands when he next meets her, but must leave her unembarrassed to decide for herself whether she will continue the acquaintanceship or ignore it.
To return to the fire. If the boarding house is not provided with a fire escape, the young gentleman will use such other means of rescue as circumstances will afford. But he will not need to change the form of his proffer of assistance; for the speech has been purposely formed in such a way as to apply with equal felicity to all methods of rescue from fire. If egress may be had to the street by the stairway, the young gentleman will offer his arm and escort the young lady down; if retreat in that direction is cut off by fire, he will escort her to the floor above and lower her to the street by a rope, fastening it by slip noose under her armpits, with the knot behind (at the same time bowing and saying "Permit me"); or if no rope be procurable, he will drop her from the balcony upon soft substances provided by the populace below--always observing "Permit me", and accompanying the remark with a slight inclination of the head. In either ascending or descending the stairs, the young gentleman shall walk beside the young lady, if the stairs are wide enough to allow it; otherwise he must precede her. In no case must he follow her. This is de rigueur.
Mem. In rescuing the chambermaid, presentation of a card is not necessary, neither should one say "Permit me". The form of tender of service should also be changed. Example:
Form of Tender of Rescue from Young Gentleman to Chambermaid at a Fire
There is no occasion for alarm, Mary [insertion of surname not permissible]; keep cool, do everything just as I tell you, and, D.V., I will save you.
Anything more elaborate than this, as to diction and sentiment, would be in exceedingly bad taste, in the case of a chambermaid. Yet at the same time, brusqueries are to be avoided. Such expressions as "Come, git!" should never fall from the lips of a true gentleman at a fire. No, not even addressed to the humblest domestic. Brevity is well; but even brevity cannot justify vulgarity.
In assisting at a fire in a boarding house, the true gentleman will always save the young ladies first--making no distinction in favor of personal attractions, or social eminence, or pecuniary prominence--but taking them as they come, and firing them out with as much celerity as shall be consistent with decorum. There are exceptions, of course, to all rules; the exceptions to this one are:
Partiality, in the matter of rescue, to be shown to:
1. Fiancees.
2. Persons toward whom the operator feels a tender sentiment, but has not yet declared himself.
3. Sisters
4. Stepsisters
5. Nieces
6. First Cousins
7. Cripples
8. Second Cousins
9. Invalids
10. Young lady relations by marriage
11. Third cousins, and young lady friends of the family
12. The unclassified
Parties belonging to these twelve divisions should be saved in the order in which they are named.
The operator must keep himself utterly calm, and his line of procedure constantly in mind; otherwise the confusion around him will be almost sure to betray him to very embarrassing breaches of etiquette. Where this is much smoke, it is often quite difficult to distinguish between new Relatives by Marriage and Unclassified Young Ladies; wherefore it is provided that if the operator, in cases of this sort, shall rescue a No. 12 when he should have rescued a No. 10, it is not requisite that he carry the No. 12 back again, but that he leave her where she is without remark, and go and fetch out No. 10. An apology to No 10 is not imperative; still it is good form to offer it. It my be deferred, however, one day--but no longer.[In a case of this nature which occurred during the first day of the Chicago fire, where the operator saved a No.7, when a No. 6 was present but overlooked in the smoke, it was held by competent authorities, that the postponement of the apology for the extraordinary term of three days was justified, it being considered that the one day term during which the apology must be offered means the day after the fire, and therefore does not begin until the fire is out. This decision was sustained by several Illinois courts though which it was carried; and experts are confident that it will also be sustained, eventually, in the Supreme Court of the United States--where it still lingers].
To return to the fire.
Observe: 1's, 3's, 4's and 5's may be carried out of the burning house, in the operator's arms--permission being first asked, and granted; 7's and 9's may be carried out without the formality of asking permission; the other grades may not be carried out, except they themselves take the initiative, and signify, by word or manner, the desire to partake of this attention.
Form for Requesting Permission to Carry a No. 1, 3, 4 or 5, out of a Boarding House Which is On Fire.
The bonds of [here insert "tenderness" in the case of a No. 1; or "blood" in other cases] which enfold us in their silken tie, warrant me, my dear [here insert given name, in all cases; and without prefix], in offering to you the refuge of my arms in fleeing the fiery doom which now, with crimson wing, o'ershadows us.
In cases where a member of one of the prohibited grades signifies a desire to be carried out of the fire, response should be made in the following form--accompanied by a peculiarly profound obeisance:
Form of Response to Indication on the part of a 2, 6, 8, 10, 11 or 12 that she Desires to be Carried Out of a Fire in the Arms of Young Gentleman.
In view of the circumstances, Madmosselle [insert name only in cases where the party is a 6 or an 8--be careful about this], that but fragile and conventional [here-in case of a No. 2--insert "Alas!"] are the bonds which enfold us in their silken tie, it is with deepest sense of the signal distinction which your condescension has conferred upon me, that I convey to you the refuge of my arms in fleeing the fiery doom which now, with crimson wing, o'ershadows us.
Other material in the boarding house is to be rescued in the following order:
13. Babies
14. Children under 10 years of age.
15. Young widows
16. Young married females
17. Elderly married ditto.
18. Elderly widows.
19. Clergymen.
20. Boarders in general.
21. Female domestics.
22. Male ditto.
23. Landlady.
24. Landlord.
25. Firemen.
26. Furniture.
27. Mothers in law.
Arbitrary introductions, made under fire, to 12s through the necessity of carrying them out of the conflagration, are not binding. It rests with the young lady to renew the acquaintanceship or let it drop. If she shall desire the renewal, she may so signify by postal card; by intimation conveyed through a friend or family; or by simple recognition of operator, by smile and slight inclination of head, the first time she meets him after the fire. In the resulting conversation the young gentleman must strictly refrain from introducing the subject of fire, or indeed of combustibles of any kind, lest he may seem to conceive and remember that he has lately done a heroic action, or at least an action meriting complementary acknowledgment; whereas, on the contrary, he should studiedly seem to have forgotten the circumstance, until the young lady shall herself--if she so please--refer to it; in which case he will bow repeatedly, smiling continuously, and accompanying each bow with the observation (uttered in a soft, apparently embarrassed, yet gratified voice) "'m very glad, 'm sure, 'm very glad, 'm sure".
Offers of marriage to parties who are being carried out from a boarding house on fire are considered to be in questionable taste, for the reason that the subject of the proposition is not likely to mistress of her best judgment at so alarming and confusing a time, and therefore it may chance that she is taken at a disadvantage. Indeed, the most authoritative canons of high breeding limit such offers inflexibly to cases where the respondent is a No. 2. In these instances, the following form should be observed:
Form of Offer of Marriage from Young Gentleman to a No. 2, during Process of Extracting Her from Boarding House on Fire, and Conveying Her out of Same in His Arms.
Ah, I supplicate, I beseech, I implore thee, dearest [here insert given name of party only], to have compassion upon thy poor kneeling henchman [do not attempt to kneel--this is but a figure of speech] and deign to be his! Deign to engender into bonds of tenderness those bonds of chill conventionality which enfold us in their silken tie, and he will ever bless the day thou didst accept the refuge of his arms in fleeing the fiery doom which now, with crimson wing, o'ershadows us.
Enough has been said, now, as to the conduct which a young gentleman of culture and breeding should observe in the case of a boarding house on fire. The same rules apply, with but slight variations (which will suggest themselves to the operator), to fire in a church, private house, hotel, railway train, or on shipboard--indeed to all fires in the ordinary walks of life.
The speeches to be used at a fire may also, with but slight alteration, be wielded with effect upon disastrous occasions of other sorts. For instance, in tendering rescue from destruction by hurricane, or earthquake, or runaway team, or railway collision (where no conflagration ensues), the operator should merely substitute "fatal doom" for "fiery doom"; and in cases of ordinary shipwreck or other methods of drowning, he should say "watery doom". No other alterations are necessary, for the "crimson wing" applies to all calamities of a majestic sort, and is a phrase of exceeding finish and felicity.
Observe, in conclusion: Offers of marriage, during episode of runaway team, are to be avoided. A lady is sufficiently embarrassed at such a time; any act tending to add to this embarrassment is opposed to good taste, and therefore reprehensible.
Etiquette
by William Schwenk Gilbert
From "Fifty 'Bab' Ballads: Much Sound and Little Sense"
1887
The Ballyshannon foundered off the the coast of Cariboo,
And down in fathoms many went the captain and the crew;
Down went the owners--greedy men whom hope of gain allured:
Oh dry the starting tear, for they were heavily ensured.
Besides the captain and the mate, the owners and the crew,
The passengers were also drowned excepting only two:
Young Peter Gray, who tasted teas for Baker, Croop & Co.
And Somers, who from Eastern shores, imported indigo.
These passengers, by reason of their clinging to a mast
Upon a desert island were eventually cast.
They hunted for their meals, as Alexander Selkirk used,
But they couldn't chat together--they had not been introduced.
For Peter Gray, and Somers too, though certainly in trade,
Were properly particular about the friends they made;
And somehow thus they settled it without a word of mouth--
That Gray should take the northern half, while Somers took the South.
On Peter's portion oysters grew--a delicacy rare,
But oysters were a delicacy Peter couldn't bear,
On Somers' side was turtle, on the shingle lying thick,
Which Somers couldn't eat, because it always made him sick.
Gray gnashed his teeth with envy as he saw a mighty store,
Of turtle unmolested on his fellow-creature's shore.
The oysters at his feet aside impatiently he shoved,
For turtle and his mother were the only things he loved.
And Somers sighed in sorrow as he settled in the south,
For the thought of Peter's oysters brought the water to his mouth.
He longed to lay him down upon the shelly bed, and stuff:
He had often eaten oysters, but had never had enough.
How they wished an introduction to each other they had had
When on board the Ballyshannon! And it drove them nearly mad.
To think how very friendly with each other they might get,
If it wasn't for the arbitrary rule of etiquette!
One day when out a hunting for the mus ridiculus,
Gray overheard his fellow man soliloquizing thus:
"I wonder how the playmates of my youth are getting on,
McConnell, S.B. Walters, Paddy Byles, and Robinson?"
These simple words made Peter as delighted as could be
Old chummies at the charterhouse were Robinson and he!
He walked straight up to Somers, then he turned extremely red.
Hesitated, hummed and hawed a bit, then cleared his throat and said:
"I beg your pardon--pray forgive me if I seem too bold,
But you have breathed a name I know familiarly of old.
You spoke aloud of Robinson--I happened to be by.
"You know him?" "Yes, extremely well" "allow me, so do I".
It was enough: they felt they could more pleasantly get on,
For (ah, the magic of the fact!) they each knew Robinson!
And Mr. Somers' turtle was at Peter's service quite,
And Mr. Somers punished Peter's oyster beds all night.
They soon became like brothers from community of wrongs:
They wrote each other little odes and sang each other songs;
They told each other anecdotes disparaging their wives;
On several occasions, too, they saved each other's lives.
They felt quite melancholy when they parted for the night,
And got up in the morning soon as ever it was light;
Each other's pleasant company they reckoned so upon,
And all because it happened that they both knew Robinson.
They lived for many years on that inhospitable shore,
And day by day they learned to love each other more and more.
At last, to their astonishment, on getting up one day,
They saw a frigate anchored in the offing of the bay.
To peter an idea occurred. "Suppose we cross the main?
So good an opportunity may not be found again".
And Somers thought a minute, then ejaculated "Done!
I wonder how my business in the City's getting on?"
"But stay," said Mr. Peter: "when in England as you know,
I earned a living tasting teas for Baker, Croop and Co.,
I may be superceded--my employer thinks me dead!"
"Then come with me," said Somers, "and taste indigo instead".
But all their plans were scattered in moment when they found
the vessel was a convict ship from Portland, outward bound;
When a boat came off to fetch them, though they felt it very kind,
To go on board they firmly but respectfully declined.
And both the happy settlers roared with laughter at the joke,
They recognized a gentlemanly fellow pulling stroke:
'Twas Robinson--a convict, in an unbecoming frock!
Condemned to seven years for misappropriating stock!!!
They laughed no more, for Somers thought he had been rather rash
In knowing one whose friend had misappropriated cash;
And Peter thought a foolish tack he must have gone upon
In making the acquaintance of a friend of Robinson.
At first they didn't quarrel very openly, I've heard;
They nodded when they met, and now and then exchanged a word;
The word grew rare, and rarer still the nodding of the head,
And when they meet each other now, they cut each other dead.
To allocate the island they agreed by word of mouth,
And Peter takes the north again, and Somers takes the south;
And Peter has the oysters, which he hates, in layers thick,
And Somers has the turtle--turtle always makes him sick.
"I have never allowed my duty as a gentleman to interfere with my pleasure in the slightest degree"
Oscar Wilde, "The Importance of Being Earnest"
Simply because a book condemned a practice did not mean that the practice ceased immediately after the book hit the stands. It was precisely because people were committing sins, large and small, that authors felt compelled to advise against them--usually with little effect.
19th Century American men were men, and were not significantly more virtuous than men before or since--despite the preaching of moralists and etiquette writers. The following page discusses a few of the Victorian gentleman's sins and, when applicable, describes some means whereby they may be properly committed. This includes the rules to several popular card games of 19th Century America.
"A man doesn't think he had a good time unless he has a headache the next morning"
"The hardest part about the 'next morning' is not the headache; it's the effort to recall what particular story you told your wife the night before"
"A man seldom escapes temptation because he is so careful not to let any interesting temptations escape him"
"It must be awful to live with a man after you have reformed him and he has become so superlatively good that you don't feel superior to him anymore"
"College boys are addicted to cigarettes and flirtations, bachelors to cigars and sweethearts; it takes a married man to get real joy out of anything so economical as a pipe or a wife"
Reflections of a Bachelor Girl, 1909
"Many are the resorts open to youth who seek amusement outside the family circle. Brilliant lights, music, exhibitions, games of chance and skill, and delightful beverages are fascinations hard to be resisted, but danger lurks beneath these attractions...
Social pleasures, carried to excess, expose young men and women to danger of moral corruption and physical disorders. The feast, the dance, the social glass, immoderately indulged in, with late hours and evil associates, have often wrought ruin to the pure and good".
Hill's Forms, 1873
"Sometimes people get a habit of spitting--which they do with much noise as though it gave them an air of importance. The inhabitants of the United States are notorious for it. It accompanies the bad custom of smoking or chewing tobacco...that anyone should allow such a habit to grow upon them is very surprising".
How to Behave. 1853
"I remarked one young man, whose handsome person, and most elaborate toilet, led me to conclude he was a first rate personage, and so I doubt not he was; nevertheless, I saw him take from the pocket of his silk waistcoat a lump of tobacco, and daintily deposit it within his cheek".
Domestic Manners of the Americans, Fanny Trollope, 1832
"Doctor,"said an old gentleman, who was an inveterate snuff-taker, to a physician, "is it true that snuff destroys the olfactory nerves, clogs and otherwise injures the brain?". "It cannot be true" was the caustic reply, "since those who have any brains never take snuff at all".
Hints on Etiquette, 1836
"Few women understand, at the outset, that in marrying, they have simply captured a wild animal, and staked their chances for future happiness on their ability to tame him. He is beautiful physically very likely, of pleasing manners and many external graces, and often possessed of noble qualities of mind and heart; but at the core of his nature he cherishes still his original savagery, the taming of which is to be the life work of the woman who has taken him in charge."
Letters from a Chimney Corner, 1886
The Early Version
Bluff or Poker, originated on the Mississippi river some time after the Louisiana Purchase in 1803. It was first mentioned in print in 1836 but the reminiscences of various gamblers printed after 1836 can place it as far back as 1829. This earliest version has the basic structure of modern Poker, but also has some interesting differences.
Number of Players: 4
Equipment: Standard deck with all cards but the Ace, King, Queen, Jack and Ten removed (20 card pack)
Sequence of Play
Once card is dealt to each player. The lowest card is the Dealer. Cards are collected, shuffled, cut and dealt to the left. Deal then moves to the left with each new hand.
The Eldest Hand (often called the "Age") who is the player to the left of the Dealer, antes in.
Each player is dealt 5 cards, one card at a time.
Each player, starting with the one to the left of the Age, must place twice the initial ante on the table or withdraw from the game. When meeting the ante, the players may also raise the pot, and each following player must meet that bet ("see the bet") or withdraw from the game ("fold"), sacrificing any bets he may have made so far. This "seeing" and "raising" continues until every player remaining in the game has "seen" but not "raised" the pot. If the other three players lacked the nerve to "see" all the "raises", the remaining player wins without showing his cards. If two or more players remain, the remaining players show their hands and the player with the strongest hand wins.
The strength of hands is judged as follows, with the weakest first and the strongest last.
Nothing: No cards in any of the above combinations.
One Pair: Two cards of the same numeration. Three unmatched.
Two Pair: Two sets of matched cards, one unmatched.
Three of a kind: Three matched cards, two unmatched.
Full: Three matched cards, and two matched cards.
Four of a kind: Four matched cards.
Royal: Four Aces and a King.
If both players have the same ranking of hand, the one whose strongest set is of the highest denomination wins (i.e. Player One has three Tens and two Queens, and Player Two has Three Kings and Two Jacks--Player Two wins). Aces are high.
Later Version
In the 1850s, the twenty-card version of Bluff/Poker fell into disuse, until it received but a passing mention in an 1858 version of Hoyle's. This version, which is essentially the modern form of Five Card Draw, had replaced it. The only significant difference between this version, and modern Poker (other than a slightly different ante system) is the lack of the "Straight". The "Straight" was mentioned as early as 1864, but it was unpopular with most players and was not generally accepted until the 1890s.
Poker was brought to England in 1872 by the American Ambassador, where it became popular among the upper classes. In the United States however, snobbery towards Poker was rather pronounced, and it was not considered appropriate for genteel families or gentlemen's clubs, though it was often played by the well healed in less formal settings.
Number of Players: Two to seven (four to six is optimum).
Equipment: Standard 52 Card Deck.
Sequence of Play
One card is dealt to each player. The player with the lowest card is the dealer. Cards are collected, shuffled, cut and dealt to the left. Deal then moves to the left with each new hand.
The Eldest Hand (often called the "Age") who is the player to the left of the dealer, antes in.
Each player is dealt 5 cards, one at a time.
Each player, starting with the one to the left of the Age, must place twice the initial ante on the table or withdraw from the game. When meeting the ante, the players may also raise the pot, and each following player must meet that bet ("see the bet" or "call") or withdraw from the game ("fold"), sacrificing any bets he may have made so far. All remaining players, starting with the Age, may then discard up to five cards and take the same number of cards from the dealer to improve their hands.
Once every player has discarded or passed, the final round of betting begins, starting with the Age and moving to the left. It continues until every player has either folded or matched the bet without raising it. The remaining players then display their hands and the strongest hand takes the pot. The final showing of the hand, by the way, is known as the "show down".
The strength of hands is judged as follows, with the weakest first and the strongest last.
Nothing: No cards in any of the above combinations.
One Pair: Two cards of the same numeration. Three unmatched.
Two Pair: Two sets of matched cards, one unmatched.
Three of a kind: Three matched cards, two unmatched.
Straight: Five cards in sequence but not in suit (Ace can be low or high)*
Flush: Five cards in suit but not in sequence.
Full House: Three matched cards, and two matched cards.
Four of a kind: Four matched cards.
Straight Flush: Five cards in suit and sequence (Ace can be low or high)*
*Not in general use until the 1890s.
If both players have the same ranking of hand, the one whose strongest set (or in the case of Straights or Flushes, the highest card) is of the highest denomination wins (i.e. Player One has three Tens and two Queens, and Player Two has Three Kings and Two Jacks--Player Two wins). Aces are high.
This concludes a "Hand". The deck is passed to the left, the new dealer reshuffles, the player opposite cuts the deck and deals out all the cards.
Variations:
Flat Poker: The same as above, but with no discard phase. The players receive their cards and start betting.
Stud Poker (First mention 1864): The players ante in. The first card is dealt face down, then the next card is placed face up. The players then have a round of betting. The remaining cards are then dealt with a betting interval between each card. When five cards are down, there is a final round of betting followed by a "show down" (the players display their cards).
Jack Pot (First mention 1870): This variation is played with any form of Poker. This Jack Pot rule states that only a player who has two Jacks or better may open the betting. If he lacks such a hand, and he is called upon to open the betting, he must fold. If a player has a sufficient hand and is called upon to do so, he must open the betting. The Jack Pot variation was popular in the West, but unpopular in the South of the United States.
Joker's Wild (1880): Around 1880, standard decks started including a Joker, ostensibly for use in playing Euchre. Poker players occasionally used it to spice up their game. In a wild card game, five of a kind was the strongest hand.
Faro is an old game, with roots going back to the 15th Century and a game called "Basset". It attained its modern form at the court of Louis XIV. Despite this distinguished pedigree, its appeal in 19th Century America ran to all classes of society, from the banker to the '49er and was commonly called, among the "baser sort", "Bucking the Tiger".
Faro is not much played today, as it is a banking game and gambling houses tend to favor games where the odds are more clearly in favor of the house. In an honest Faro game, the punter's chances are just a little short of even of coming out ahead. Most dealers skewed those odds in their favor with some quite remarkable card shuffling and other ingenious ways of cheating. I won't go into that here however, but will assume that your table is a rare exception, and is completely on the square.
Equipment
In its most basic form, the Faro table is a long rectangle (perhaps two feet by one and a half) It is covered in green felt, and laid upon this felt is the "lay-out". This is a complete suit of Spades, glued to the table and lacquered to keep them from dog-earing. The cards are laid out in two rows, running left to right. The Ace through Six is on the lower row (nearest the dealer's side of the table), the Seven is on the far right of the rows, mid way between the upper and lower row, and the Eight through King is on the upper row. This is the basic table. There are numerous refinements, which add to the class, but also to the complexity of construction.
These could include the following:
1. A raised divider, running about 8" from the edge of the table, on the player's side, to clearly delineate the players' pots from their wagers (the pot is on their side, the wager in on the dealer's side). This is not necessary if the Faro table is a separate small table set on a larger table.
2. A spring-loaded box to hold the cards. The spring ensures that the top card is always pressed against the top rim of the box, regardless of how many cards are in the box. The box has a rim to hold the cards in place, but no top. The face of the top card is visible to all players.
3. A "cue box" or "case keeper". This is the most complicated part of the Faro rig. It is constructed something like an abacus, with the image of each card in the Spade suit in the middle of the frame. A rod leads out of each card and on the rod is four counters. The dealer uses this to keep track of the cards which have been pulled. Each time a card his pulled, regardless of suit, he moves one counter to the far side of the rod.
4. A space marked "High Card" or "H.C." on the back edge of the table (nearest the Dealer). When this is present, the Punters may place wagers here to bet on whether the winning card (the second card drawn) will be higher than the losing card (the first card drawn). If they win, they are paid off one-to-one. They may "copper" this bet (see below) to reverse it. The High Card option dates from the last quarter of the 19th Century.
5. Chips (more commonly called "Checks") to indicate bets, though checks can be dispensed with and money placed directly on the layout. It is easiest for the Dealer if each Punter has checks of a different color or design. Colored checks can be placed on top of a bet to indicate the owner.
The cards used in Faro are a standard, familiar 52 card "French" Deck (Hearts, Diamonds, Spades, Clubs etc.)
The Game:
The Dealer's deck is placed face down on the table or face up in the Card Box.
The game commences with each player (called a "punter") laying wagers on the card images on the Faro table.

If the wager is placed directly over the card image, the Punter is wagering on only that card. A player may wager on two cards by placing his wager mid-way between two card images. He may place a single wager upon four cards by placing the wager between four of them
A Punter may place as many separate bets as he wishes or can afford.
The Dealer discards the top card (the "Soda Card"). The Dealer then wins any wagers, placed on the next card displayed (e.g. if the card should be an Ace, the Dealer collects all wagers placed on the Ace). The first card, which wins for the dealer is called the "losing card.".
The Dealer discards that card, revealing the next card. If that card is (for example) a Five, he pays off all wagers which had been placed on the Five. The second card, which wins for the Punters, is called the "winning card." The payoff is one-to-one. A dollar bet wins a dollar.
This concludes a single "Turn". In the interval between turns, the Punters may place additional wagers or increase existing ones, or move wagers from one card to another. New players may also join the game between the turns and players who still have money/chips on the table, may withdraw their wagers and either leave the game or sit out one or more turns.
The game continues in Turns, with the first draw going to the Dealer and the second to the Punters, until the deck is exhausted. The strategy lies in keeping track of which cards have been pulled. The players may watch the Cue Box (if one is present) and/or make written notes to aid their memories (the cue box may be worked by the Dealer, one of the Punters or the Dealer's Assistant, called the "Lookout"). When the Dealer gets to the bottom of the deck, the deck is reshuffled, cut and replaced, face up on the table. A Faro game has no real ending, and can continue indefinitely, with new players entering between turns and old players being wiped out or cashing out.
Coppering
The Punters have the option of "Coppering" a bet. This means placing a copper token (traditionally a Penny) on top of the bet. A Coppered bet wins on the first card, and loses on the second (the opposite of a usual bet).
Calling the Turn/Last Call:
When someone has been keeping track of the cards played (that is what the Cue Box is for), and the players become aware that they are down to the last three cards in the deck, any Punter has the option of "calling the turn". To do this, he must name the three cards remaining (not difficult if the Cue Box has been used properly), and the order in which they will be pulled. If he gets it right, he wins his bet. If he gets it wrong, he loses. As in all other aspects of Faro, suit is immaterial. If a player calls the turn successfully, he is paid off four-to-one. If two of the three cards are the same denomination (called a "cat"), then the winner is paid off only two-to-one. If all three cards are the same (highly unlikely), then the turn may not be called.
Splits:
If the first and second card are of the same denomination, or if the Punter has wagered the same stake on two cards, and one loses while the other wins, then the house only takes half the losing bet. If the amount cannot be cleanly divided in two, the difference goes to the dealer.
The Cue Box

The Cue Box (also called the "Case Keeper") is used to keep track of the turning of the cards. It may be operated by the Dealer, the Lookout, or, most commonly, by one of the more sober punters. Each time a card is played, one of the disks for that card is moved. A proper game of Faro must involve keeping an accurate track of the cards played, and if a Cue Box is not present, then the players must "Keep Tabs" by tracking the cards with a paper and pencil. This is necessary for the following reasons:
1. It allows players to bet only on cards that are likely to turn up.
2. It makes it possible to call the turn at the end.
3. The House customarily collects all bets remaining on the table after the last card is turned.
A collection of 19th and Early 20th Century photographs of men.

This is a collection of images of men from the mid 19th Century.

A sturdy middle class couple of the late 1850s or early 1860s. Note the fringe beard and small bow tie.
He is also wearing a frock suit, typical of respectable gentlemen of the era. In keeping with the style of the mid-19th Century, his trousers are black, rather than gray pinstripe, which they would have been 20 years or so later.
She is wearing a typical day dress, probably of silk from the look of it, without a hoop and with an odd sort of bow thing at her neck.
This fellow has some rather striking mutton chops. He is probably from the 1860s or 70s. Note also his lack of necktie.
This lack of a necktie is quite common in 19th Century American portraits, even on men who look quite mainstream and respectable. The collar button however, is nearly always buttoned, and in this case, closed with a shirt stud.
Also note the velvet collar on his frock coat.
This man has the full beard and long hair that was fashionable in the later 1850s and the 1860s.
The mid 19th Century was the golden age of whiskers for men. At no other time in history was there such an amazing variety of facial hair, ranging from this simple beard, to elaborate combinations of beards, mustaches and mutton chops.
By the 1870s, facial hair starts a slow retreat so that by the end of the century, it is, with the exception of some interesting mustaches, just something you see on older men or Bohemian non-conformists.
A young man wearing a necktie tied in a very simple square knot.
This is the most basic style of necktie in a period when there is an almost infinite selection of knots into which a tie may be tied.
His facial hair choice is also quite simple, with a narrow mustache. He also has carefully combed and oiled hair, and a velvet collar on his frock coat.
Note also his falling band collar which has clearly been starched. This man is perhaps untypical of his era in that he has paid a great deal of attention to his appearance.
This is one of the more interesting pictures in my collection, in that the quality of the image suggests a late 1850s - 1860s date, but his coat and necktie suggest an earlier date--perhaps 1840s.
This is perhaps a testament to one of the great rules of men's fashion: "Hey, it still fits, why should I change it?"
A rather romantical looking young man in a fringe beard, reading a book. He is in an all black frock suit with an odd collar which suggests that he is a clergyman.
He has the long hair of the mid-19th Century, and a fringe beard without mustache.
As is typical with 19th Century men, he has the top button of his coat buttoned, which keeps his coat from flopping around, but still gives him easy access to his pocket watch.
This young man has some interesting facial hair.
Click on the image for a larger version.
This man, who has a fine full beard, is wearing an interesting high collared vest and a sturdy duffle coat. The ends of his string tie are visible under his beard.
These two well fed gentlemen are wearing frock suits with black trousers. This is typical of the 1860s.
By the way, who says everyone in the 19th Century was thin?
This young man in a frock coat has his vest buttons undone in a style typical of the 1860s.
The tendency to leave vest buttons unbuttoned was widespread in the 1860s, along with baggy clothes, unkempt hair and sloppy ties. It was all part of a notion that if a man spent too much time on his appearance, it indicated a shallowness of character.
That changed in the 1870s, when it once again became the fashion for men to take some pride in their appearance.
Note also the tape edging on his coat -- this was probably silk. Such edging is a very common feature of 19th and early 20th Century coats and vests.
A collection of images of men from the 3rd Quarter of the 19th Century.
A young man in a fore-in-hand tie and frock coat.

The man in this picture has a closed collar but no necktie.

While a beard like this would be out of fashion by the 1870s, the lapel-less vest and general look of the image suggests that later date.

This gentleman, from (probably) the 1870s, has a fine mustache and a velvet collar.

Another fine example of a Victorian man's beard with a sack suit. By the 70s and 80s, beards were becoming the badge of older men, who had acquired the habit in their youth in the 1850s and 60s.

This man exudes respectability in his black frock suit with black vest. His cane appears to have an ivory handle. His tie appears to be white, which is an interesting detail. He may be a Protestant clergyman.

This young man has a rather striking necktie. Also note the check pattern on his trousers. I think he is from the 1860s or 70s (probably the 70s)

This very respectable looking gentleman has a stiff shirt front with studs, but no necktie. Perhaps a tie would be lost under his long beard.

A black double breasted frock coat and single breasted vest. He is wearing a Windsor Knot necktie and winged collar (of the sort that is easily findable at any Tux shop). Note the watch chain with the bar on the outside of the vest. I personally don't like the look of it, and don't wear it that way, but it is very typical of the time, and testament to the fact that there is no one right way to wear a watch chain.
Also note the piping and facings on the frock coat, and the fact that he is missing a button.

This fellow in a black suit and bow tie is probably from the 1880s or 90s. The wide collar suggests that he is wearing a frock coat.

A typical sack suit, with the top button buttoned and an ascot style tie with a pin. His pocket handkerchief and the line and heel of his boots are clearly visible.

This young man has a somewhat out of fashion non-black frock coat with a velvet collar, a stiff starched shirt and a small string tie.

This young man is wearing a frock suit with an ascot and tie pin. He is British. This image was struck in Wolverhapton.

A younger man in a black sack suit soft collar and a very wide bow tie. Also note the slightly unusual position of his watch chain, with the watch high up in his breast pocket. This also gives an excellent view of the typical straight waist line of the 19th Century vest.

Images of men from the end of the 19th and the beginning of the 20th Century.
This fellow is wearing a very nicely tailored pin-striped sack suit and a well tied bow tie. Also note the simple standing collar. From his hair and general neatness, I would date this from the 1880s or 90s.

This young man is wearing a typical Windsor knot tie and four-button dark wool sack coat with the top button fastened. Note the not-terribly-stiff standing collar.

Note the unbuttoned collar, crooked tie and bulky jacket of the young man.

This card game can be dated pretty well by the lady's leg o'mutton sleeves to the mid 1890s. The men are pretty typically dressed, and the only beard is attached to a middle aged man. The young men are clean shaven. The older man is wearing a respectable frock coat, the younger men in less formal sack suits.

This gentleman has his frock coat buttoned, with a stiff standing collar. He is wearing a flower corsage, and is probably part of a wedding party.
Click on the image for a larger version.
Swarthy looking men in a photo taken in New York.
Click on image for a larger view
The stiff standing collar is typical of the end of the 19th and the beginning of the 20th Century, as is the very tidy bow tie. The suit has a nice pattern in the wool.

This young man is wearing a stiff standing collar and an interesting small striped bowtie with his frock coat. While the details are obscured, his watch chain appears to be arranged in an interesting and complex pattern.

This looks like a portly farm owner and a blacksmith, standing in front of a barn. This is an excellent view of how the majority of American men looked on an ordinary working day.

Images of men dating from around 1910 to the end of the 1920s.
The cut of the coat and the hair suggest that this (probably) Catholic priest dates from around 1910.

This young man has a high stiff, removable collar attached to a striped shirt, and his hair is parted fashionably down the middle. This is a typical look of the early 20th Century.

A few items of general interest, that do not fall into the categories of "Attire" or "Behavior".
"The American Inn... is altogether an institution apart, a thing of itself. Hotels in America are very much larger and more numerous than in other countries. They are to be found in all towns, and I may almost say in all villages...In the States of America the first sign of an incipient settlement is an hotel five stories high, with an office, a bar, a cloak room, three gentlemen's parlours, two ladies' parlours, a ladies' entrance, and two hundred bedrooms".
Anthony Trollope, North America, 1863
"You enter the hotel and silently sign your name in the guest book. Next to your name they silently write the number of the room you will occupy, and silently hand the key to a Negro. He by innate talkativeness interrupts the silence, takes the traveling bags and guides you to the assigned room"
Aleksadandr Borisovich Lakier, 1857
"One is in a free country, yet in an American inn, one can never do as one likes. A terrific gong sounds early in the morning, breaking one's sweet slumbers, and then a second gong sounding some thirty minutes later, makes you understand that you must proceed to breakfast, whether you be dressed or no. You certainly can go on with your toilet and obtain your meal after half an hour's delay. Nobody actually scolds you you for so doing, but the breakfast is, as they say in this country, 'through'. They begrudge you no amount that you can eat or drink; but they begrudge you a single moment that you sit neither eating nor drinking. This is your fate if you're too late, and therefore as a general rule you are not late."
Anthony Trollope, North America, 1863
Primary Sources
Beeton, Isabella Mary Mayson, 1836-1865. Book of household management. Mrs. Beeton's cookery and household management. [New ed.] London, Ward Lock [c1960] 1344 p. illus. (part col.) 24 cm.
Dodworth, Allen. Dancing and its relations to education and social life : with a new method of instruction...,, by Allen Dodworth. New and enlarged ed. New York, Harper & Brothers [1888] vi, 302 p. front. (port.) illus. 20 cm.
Eighteen Distinguished Authors [sic], Correct Social Usage: a course of instruction in good form, style and deportment.New York. The New York Society of Self-Culture, 1903
Gaskell, George A., 1844-?. Gaskell's Compendium of forms : educational, social, legal, and commercial, embracing a complete self-teaching course in penmanship and bookkeeping, and aid to English composition ... also, a manual of agriculture and mechanics, with a complete guide to parliamentary practice
/, by G. A. Gaskell. Chicago : Fairbanks, Palmer, 1880. 493 p. : ill., forms, plates, ports. ; 28 cm.
Gaskell, George A., 1844-? Writing as Samuel Smiles, Happy homes and the hearts that make them or thrifty people and why they thrive, US Publishing House, Chicago, 1882 644 p. :ill, plates.
Hill, Thomas E. 1832-1915. Manual of social and business forms. Selections. Never give a lady a restive horse; a 19th century handbook of etiquette. Berkeley [Calif.] Diablo Press, 1967. 143 p. illus., port. 28 cm.
Houghton, Walter R. et al. Rules of etiquette and home culture or what to do and how to do it. Chicago, 1886. Rand, McNally & Co.
King, Charles, 1844-1933. The colonel's daughter; or, winning his spurs. Philadelphia, J. B. Lippincott & co., 1883. 2 p. l., 440 p. 19 cm.
Happy Homes and the Hearts That Make Them
Martine, Arthur, Martine's handbook of etiquette and guide to true politeness; a complete manual for those who desire to understand the rules of good breeding,the customs of good society, and to avoid incorrect and vulgar habits. New York, Dick & Fitzgerald, 1866--As republished in Civil War Era Etiquette, R.L. Shep editor and publisher, 1988.
Ransom, J. Clinton. Successful life: designed to teach the young how to attain the highest success and to lead both old and young to a more useful, happy and prosperous life /, Philadelphia, PA : L. P. Miller & Co, 1891, 606 p
Rowland, Helen, Reflections of a bachelor girl/, New York, dodge Publishing Company, 1909
Trollope, Anthony, 1815-1882. North America. Philadelphia, J.B. Lippincott, 1862.
Trollope, Fanny & Pamela Neville-Sington Domestic Manners of the Americans Originally published 1842. Paperback - 416 pages (29 May, 1997) Penguin Books
White, Annie R.. Polite society at home and abroad: a complete compendium of information on all topics classified under the head of etiquette /, Chicago IL: L.P. Miller & Co 1891. 448 p
Young, John H.. Our deportment : or, The manners, conduct and dress of the most refined society /, compiled by John H. Young. Harrisburg, PA : Pennsylvania Publishing Co, 1880, c1879. 415 p
Secondary Sources
Aldrich, Elizabeth, 1947-. From the ballroom to hell : grace and folly in nineteenth-century dance /, Evanston, Ill. : Northwestern University Press, 1991. xix, 225 p. : ill. ; 29 cm.
Bushman, Richard L.. The refinement of America : persons, houses, cities. 1st ed. New York : Knopf : Distributed by Random House, 1992
Green, Harvey, 1946-. The light of the home : an intimate view of the lives of women in Victorian America /, Harvey Green, with the assistance of Mary-Ellen Perry ; with illustrations from the Margaret Woodbury Strong Museum. 1st ed. New York : Pantheon Books, c1983. xv, 205 p. : ill. ; 24 cm.
Haller, John S. Jr & Robin Haller. The Physician and Sexuality in Victorian America. /.Urbana Ill, University of Illinois Press. 1974.
Hansen, Karen V.. A very social time : crafting community in antebellum New England /, Berkeley : University of California Press, c1994. xv, 262p., [24] p. of plates : ill., map. ; 24 cm.
Harris, J. William, 1946-. Plain folk and gentry in a slave society : white liberty and Black slavery in Augusta's hinterlands /, 1st ed. Middletown, Conn. : Wesleyan University Press ; Scranton, Pa. : Distributed by Harper & Row, 1985. xv, 274 p. : ill. ; 23 cm.
Kasson, John F. Rudeness & Civility : Manners in Nineteenth-Century Urban America / Paperback / Published 1991
Knight, Oliver. Life and manners in the frontier army /, 1st ed. Norman : University of Oklahoma Press, c1978. vii, 280 p. ; 21 cm.
Kortum, Sarah. The hatless man : an anthology of odd & forgotten manners /; drawings by Ronald Searle. New York : Viking, 1995. xiv, 191 p. : ill. ; 24 cm.
Pease, Jane H.. Ladies, women, and wenches : choice and constraint in antebellum Charleston and Boston /, Chapel Hill : University of North Carolina Press, c1990. xiii, 218 p. : ill. ; 23 cm. Series title: Gender & American culture
St. George, Andrew.. The descent of manners: etiquette, rules & the Victorians /, London : Random House, c1993. 330 p. : ill. ; 23 cm.
Sutherland, Daniel E.. The expansion of everyday life, 1860-1876 /,1t ed. New York : Harper & Row, c1989. xiii, 290 p., [24] p. of plates : ill. ; 22 cm. Series title: The Everyday life in America series
Internet Resources
(Note: the Internet is a moving target. These links were good as of February, 2004, but may disappear any time thereafter).
White, Anna R. Youth's educator for home and society: Being a Manual of Correct Deportment for Boys and Girls as well as for Older Ones Who Have Been Denied the Privileges and Benefits Arising from Social Intercourse, with Choice Chapters upon Kindred Topics. Union Publishing House, Chicago.1896 http://www.history.rochester.edu/ehp-book/yefhas/ (University of Rochester History Department Home Page)
An American Ballroom Companion: 1490-1920. A compendium of over one hundred dancing manuals, in full text, with illustrations, from the 15th to the 19th Century. Library of Congress. http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/dihtml/dihome.html
Emily Post's 1922 edition of: Etiquette in Society, Business, Politics and at Home. http://www.bartleby.com/95/